Bibliography- Differences Between Critical And Creative Thinking - Assessment Answer

Bibliography Assignment

Assignment Task

Discuss the differences between critical and creative thinking and then explain how critical thinking and creative thinking can be used to overcome plagiarism.

Introduction

Creative thinking and critical thinking in reducing plagiarism

Alghafri, Ali Salim Rashid, and Hairul Nizam Bin Ismail. "The Effects of Integrating Creative and Critical Thinking on Schools Students' Thinking." International Journal of Social Science and Humanity4, no. 6 (2014): 518.

The article is about the integrative role of creative and critical thinking in promoting thinking abilities and skills of students. The authors conducted the study on primary school students in Malaysia. They used a quasi-experimental design to answer the research questions and the results compared to a control group. The authors found that score on creativity and fluency between the two groups was significantly different suggesting that when educators integrate both critical thinking and creative thinking in the learning environment, the learners will improve their thinking skills. This directly relates to plagiarism that is often cited as a problem in academic writing. When students are taught creativity at an early age, it will be easier for them to use these skills in writing. The student will be original in their work and chances of plagiarism will be greatly reduced.

Critical thinking has become essential in higher education settings. The author reported the different perceptions and understanding of the concept of critical thinking among university settings. The results showed that staff and student perceive critical thinking in the same way. This is a fundamental finding in the promotion of critical thinking skills among the students. The fact that the student can understand the concept means that it would be equally easy for them to practice it in every day settings. The information presented in the paper will act as a starting point for promotion of critical thinking among student. The results will be a culture of creativity and originality in higher education settings.

Creative and critical thinking have emerged as important elements in today’s education and school system. Chan conducted a systematic review on the various types of nursing course structure that promoted critical thinking and creativity among students. Being a systematic review, the author searched literature in medical databases that are reliable and validated. Diversity in the learning process, freedom of the student and learning in groups were among the methods identified by the author to contribute to creative thinking and critical thinking. The author agrees that critical thinking and creativity is essential in fostering original ideas from the students. It is the role of educators to designed education programs that will learn activity and convert ideas into actions. The teachers must create an environment that will make the students develop original constructive and useful ideas. The educators will be helping promote a culture of originality and help prevent plagiarism

The authors wrote a very interesting article which is about the synergy of critical thinking and creative thinking in school settings. The authors have tackled an essential element of critical thinking and creative thinking skills. As noted in the article, most studies have focused on individual effects of critical thinking and creative thinking in schools. The present study looked at the combined effects of both among students. The authors used a post-test quasi-experimental design to study middle school students in Taiwan. Critical thinking skills were enhanced among student that were exposed to both critical thinking and creative thinking tests. The originality level of student who combined both critical thinking and creative thinking was very high. This result shows or reveals a method we can use to reduce plagiarism in school. This is by combining both creative and critical thinking among the students. The two approaches should be used simultaneously to promote individual thinking among the students

The article is about the role of collaborative assessment in improving critical thinking and writing skills among students. The authors conducted a review of relevant literature on the various methods of enhancing critical and writing skills. The authors conducted experiments using collaborative assessment on two groups of students. It was clear that collaborative assessment was essential in developing critical thinking and writing skills. The students were able to write based on their own ideas. The information presented in the paper is critical to English language teachers who want to use critical thinking skills to promote originality and creativity among the students. They are advised to use collaborative assessment approaches when teaching the students. The information is very informative to teachers and other stakeholders in the education sector. However, it only focused on EFL students. It is uncertain whether the same results can be generalized for other students

The article by Chan looked at the importance of critical thinking skills and creativity among nursing students. However, all students need these skills. All students need to be original in their work and develop own ideas and solutions to problems. In this light, James looked at critical thinking skills and creativity among law students. Unlike the other articles, James chose to focus on the law curriculum based on the Australian context. According to the author the Australian TLO advocates for originality and critical thinking skills among the law students. With legal reasoning, critical thinking and creative thinking skills, this student will be able to have essential skills not only important in school but also in everyday life. The author supports the role of critical thinking and creativity by analysing literature that justifies the teaching of critical thinking and creative thinking skills among our students. This may be linked to reduction of plagiarism among students. When student learn the skills of creative and critical thinking chances are high that they be original in all their writings.

It is true that the transfer of critical thinking skill and creativity is essential in the education process. However, scholars are still discussing the best ways to foster these skills among students. In attempt to find the answer to this dilemma, the authors compared explicit and imbedded approaches to assess which was better at promoting critical thinking skills. The authors conducted the study among high school students in the US. The two approached were chosen based on the fact that they are commonly used in everyday school setting. The results promoted the use of critical thinking skills in schools. Explicit instruction based approached to education was better in promoting critical thinking skills among the students. The information presented in this paper adds to the existing knowledge on the methods to enhance critical thinking skills among students. The results support the use of explicit institution by teacher in promoting creativity among students. such student will be original in their writing reducing cases of plagiarism in our schools

Critical thinking skills have been used to promote originality among students for many years. According to the author, journal writing is one of the methods that can be used to promote critical thinking and creativity ion writing among students. The experiment was conducted in Egypt. Based on the results presented by the author, journal writing enhanced critical thinking skills and creativity among the students. These results are important for teachers especially on the higher education level. Journal writing activities can be used to promote individuality and creativity among the students. This way the student will be able to learn to do independent work be creative. The fact that the students will be learning to develop on their own ideas will be essential in reducing cases of plagiarism in schools