Human Life- Human Life -Abortion - Euthanasia and Bio-Ethics - Article Writing Assessment Answer

December 14, 2018
Author : Ashley Simons

Solution Code: 1EIBA

Question:Human Life

This assignment is related to ”Human Life” and experts atMy Assignment Services AUsuccessfully delivered HD quality work within the given deadline.

Human Life Assignment

Assignment Task

Write an article addressing an ethical issue of public and community relevance for a church lay leader audience. academically informed, but accessibly written. The article should address a different moral topic as the major essay, unless otherwise directed. The public engagement article should demonstrate improved arguments and engagement with resources by consideration of marking feedback from the essay. Engagement with popular media, news, or legislation is acceptable in order to demonstrate contextual relevance for the audience. The article should be written with an eye toward a Christian view and an eye towards equipping Christians in the public sphere – consideration of public ethical principles is advised.

These assignments are solved by our professional Human Life at My Assignment Services AU and the solution are high quality of work as well as 100% plagiarism free. The assignment solution was delivered within 2-3 Days.

Our Assignment Writing Experts are efficient to provide a fresh solution to this question. We are serving more than 10000+ Students in Australia, UK & US by helping them to score HD in their academics. Our Experts are well trained to follow all marking rubrics & referencing style.

Solution:

An ethical issue of public and community relevance for a church lay leader audience.

The church's mission totally depends on the ability to encourage its people to do God's work. The primary purpose of the church is to bring the individual to Christ, taking into consideration of their need and guide them in their spiritual magnification. The increasing church numbers are creating new ways of supporting people and resourcing the people to follow the path of the Christ (Engelhardt, 2000; Winslow GR, N.A). In this essay, the thorough discussion about the thinking and practice of the equipping churches will undertake. In the following paragraph, the ethical issues of the community and public reverence for the church lay leader audience will be discussed. The churches which equip the people, always try to encourage the people to think what is the mission of God in this world, how the activity of human can connect the human with the God, and How the church can help the people to do God’s work. The following question will be discussed in the essay concerning the euthanasia, Bio ethics, and abortion.

The God’s mission includes inspiring the people to work by using material that he provided to bring the good and new creations so that the natural world can be maintained as it is. The world created by God is beautiful and useful, and when men start to work alongside the creation of God, things become more wonderful. According to the church lay leader, the act performs by the human being is directly matter to God. For the evaluation of the act of the human being is Christian ethic. The Christian ethics evaluate the behavior of the individual from the perspective of Christian. The Christian values are the teaching of the Jesus Christ for the benefit of the individual. In the modern world, the scernio is changed a lot. The concern topics include sexual content in movies, abortion, sexual intimacy outside the marriage, same-sex marriage, homosexuality, and in the public schools no organized prayer.

Recent developments of the bioethics put forward specific questions that need to be addressed by Christians. The issues include abortion, euthanasia, reproduction, bioethics, human genetics, etc. The conflict about abortion is turning uglier with time and the development of medical science promise to deepen the moral issues and questions. The God wants people to protect and care fetus. Moreover, the development of the abortifacient drug creates s serious matter related to moral values. With time the abortion is the most significant issue which new bioethical discussion began. Thinking about abortion is one of the founding and fundamental concern of ethics. It is difficult to tell about the effect of this act on individual’s life and the Christian moralists. The Christian moralists, arguments did not help in the stoppage of this action. The modern medicine and modern society follow the permissive abortion practice. Initially, it was illegal and morally rejected. It is associated with the human sentiment so required justification. The related issue of Bioethics is to evaluate the developments of the moral debate related to abortion and the view about uncovering its importance for the moral life of Christian. In the 1960s the abortion policy develops and stated that the abortion is the falliacious act (Engelhardt, 2000).

Rejection of the abortion was connected to the Christian life’s central concern. In the society where abortion was well tolerated, this act was rejected by the Christian population. Patrick Lee’s article stated that it is mandatory for Christians to evaluate critically and understand the current profane discussions. Lee opined that there are three aspects to think about the abortion act. The first includes the controversy related to the embryo that the embryos are human; the second point is whether the human as such is individual having moral status, and the third concern is about the responsibility of the parents especially mother for their unaccepted fetus. Still, there is confusion that the fetus is human or not and concerning the research on stem cell that indicates the embryo as the whole human. It is the duty of the lady to protect her fetus as there is biological root that ties the mother with the fetus. The Catholic church preaches that the human life should be protected and respected (Council, S. V. E., 1994).It opposes the act whose motivation is to kill fetus or embryo for any motive before implantation too, but certain treatment modality in cervical cancer can also kill the fetus will not be considered for sin. The church had affirmed that the procured abortion comes under moral evil. In the Canon law, it is mentioned that the automatic damnation due to some treatment modality to save the life of the mother will not go to be considered as the sin and forgiveness can be rendered to that lady. According to the Eastern Orthodox Chruch, life starts with the conception and abortion is an cruel act of taking away the human life. In the 20thcentury, the Protestant stood for abortion and against the action too. African American were against than the white protestant. Some protestant believed that the abortion should be legalised. The president Bill Clinton opined that the abortion should be legal, rare and safe. Some protectors support abortion and opined that it should be the choice of the person but should accept morally ( Stiltner, 2013). There are three groups which debate on the abortion includes pro-life, pro-choice and exceptions. The pro-life opine in favour of the fetus and baby stated that the abortion is not acceptable morally. As per the pro-life group, abortion is equivalent to human killing. The only exception is when the mother's life is at stake then the abortion is not consider to be crime. This point by the point of Roman catholic church. The 2ndgroup is pro-choice group that stated that the mother has full right over her body and baby so she can decide about the abortion. This group said that the prior to 24 weeks the mother has legal choice for abortion, after that she is bound by legal frame work and cant abort the child. The third opined that the abortion is good if it is in the benefits to the women's' mental and physical health. The abortion is not a sin if the parents know about the physical and mental handicap state of the child ( Crooks, 2015).

The second topic of concern is Euthanasia; it is the practice of intentionally ending of the life to get relieved from suffering and pain. Euthanasia is one of the ethical issues. Although the peak of this point has not reached up to the top level. According to different countries, there are different laws as well as various views too. The progression in the biomedical area had brought the significant benefits to the human being. These same had also created the problem concerning the ethics ( Dworkinr, 2011). Now, the people are healthy and have the reasonable life expectancy. The medical area is growing very rapidly and trying to decrease the mortality rate and associated pain too. Economically sound people can enjoy the benefits of a rapidly growing medical field, but the more unfortunate people have to suffer yet. The Euthanasia can be divided into two includes the active and passive form. The passive type allows the individual to die, by the discontinuation of the treatment. The active one consists of the positive step for life termination by taking some toxic injection, substance, or bubble injection administration in the bloodstream. Most the time Euthanasia is voluntary, where the individual wants to die. Although, it can be involuntary where the individual has no choice. The passive euthanasia is not considered to be sin in Christianity. A large number of followers of Christ has no objection to passive euthanasia (Erickson, M. J., & Bowers, 1976). There can be some circumstances where the euthanasia can be contemplated if the person has no option to live. Although, this act is equivalent to murder only. The question emerges that the person who is suffering from pain and no other choice is there then in that case the euthanasia is murder or right. According to the sixth Commandment, it is a sin to put the person to death whether he or she is suffering from distressing disease or pain( Niebuhr R, 2012; Rawls, 2009).

The Catholic teaching is entirely against the act of euthanasia and consider it as a great sin against the life. They opined that the self-killing is against the God too and it's a crime against supreme power. The catholic teaching is based on the several principles based on the human rights, human life sanctity, and humans’ dignity. The Christians are totally against euthanasia. The arguments are based on the ground that God gave the life, and the man is made from God's imagination. The human being has no rights to kill themselves. The value of every person’s life is identical and should be valued. According to Christianity, it is wrong to treat lives as barren and to conclude that they should die. Moreover, the people with disability have the same importance as other humans. The people who are sick or old have the equal significance than the other individual. The people with the chronic serious disease have the equivalent value as the other who is leading the healthy life, as the internal values are same. The Christianity suggest some opinions according to that euthanasia is not a crime, As the Christianity suggests that the everyone should respect each other and respect the decision too. The other should accept the conclusion of the sick person if he or she refuses for the treatment. Moreover, the Christianity belies in respecting every person so the decision should be regarded too( Quill, T. E., Lo, B., & Brock, 2008; McMahan, 2002). There are three issues related to the Euthanasia includes the value, autonomy, and the fear. The autonomy consists of the concept that the human has right to take own decision. The value includes that the human is created by God and do not have any right to die with the personal wish. The fear includes the fear to see the love one in pain and horrid situation. The people feel humiliated to be dependent on other. There are many different views on the Euthanasia, but the Christianity said that God had made human being and volitional being too.

There is framework for the decision related to Bioethical, includes analysis, alternatives, principles, decision, evaluation. Thes five steps are there for the making any decision concerning the bioethics. The analysis includes the fact of the question, values related to question, associated conflict concerning values, and affects on human relationship. The alternatives include the course of action and effects of the options. The principle consists of the God's word and law, as the mature Christian decides on the bases of God's policy. The decision depends on the careful and prayer of Bible study. Moreover, it includes the choice that is best for the person by the biblical principles. It also provides for the evaluation of the obstacles that can face following decision. The evaluation step includes the honest assessment of all levels and the resolution ( Winslow G R, N.A).

Different religion has the different view on abortion, euthanasia, human genetics, marriage in the same sex, reproduction and bioethics. From the perspective of the Bible, God had Created human being by imagination and special powers. So as per the above discussion, it is clear that the euthanasia and abortion is the crime and against the principle of God too. But in some cases, it can not be considered as the misdeed. As in some cases, it is important for the mother to abort the fetus for the sake of her own life. The euthanasia can be followed in passive cases.

Find Solution for Human Life assignment by dropping us a mail at help@myassignmentservices.com.au along with the question’s URL. Get in Contact with our experts at My Assignment Services AU and get the solution as per your specification & University requirement.

RELATED SOLUTIONS

Order Now

Request Callback

Tap to ChatGet instant assignment help

Get 500 Words FREE